October 2003: 26 and November 2003: 2, 9, 16, 23, 30
 
 
October 26, 2003
     
"A Name Which Is Above Every Name"
By Paul R. Blake
A Life Filled With Testing
By Kent E. Heaton, Sr.
"A Name Which Is Above Every Name"
By Paul R. Blake

........"Therefore God also has highly exalted Him and given Him the name which is above every name, 10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of those in heaven, and of those on earth, and of those under the earth, 11 and that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father" (Phil. 2:9-11).
........It is testimony to the high justice of God that following the voluntary, deep humiliation of Jesus that the Father would highly exalt him. As low as Jesus was brought in obedience to God by coming in the form of a servant and dying in a shameful manner, so high would He be exalted when He completed the task of the salvation of humankind.

A Great Name

........The names of all righteous men would pale into insignificance beside the glorious name of Jesus Christ. Abraham who was the father of the Jewish race, ancestor of the Savior, and model of faith for all men in all times would not be as important as that of Christ. Moses who was leader and lawgiver to the people of God, the prince who became a prophet, and the man who was the most humble of all men, would fade at the coming of the carpenter's son born in a manger, Who was revealed to be the Son of God and by means of a bloody cross and an open tomb, became King of kings and Lord of lords. Peter attempted to set up worship stations for Jesus, Moses, and Elijah; and God stopped him with the words, "This is My beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased. Hear Him!" (Matt. 17:4-5). No name in all of history has impacted this world as that of Jesus Christ.
A Powerful Name

........The name of Jesus Christ bears all authority in this world. He was given all authority by God (Matt. 28:18); and therefore, all spiritual activities of Christians must be in the name of (or by the authority of) Jesus Christ (Col. 3:17). In all matters of the work, worship, and organization of the Church, Jesus Christ is the last word in authority and preeminence (Col. 1:18). All matters of religious doctrine must bear the hallmark of the name of Jesus Christ, for only His doctrine forms the basis of fellowship among believers (2John 9-11); doctrines created by and named after men only bring damnation and division.
The Name of Salvation
........The name of Jesus Christ is the only name through which one can access salvation from sins and eternal life (Acts 4:12). His name must be publicly confessed before the penitent believer can be washed of his sins in baptism (Rom. 10:9-10; Acts 8:37-38). Public confession of the name of Jesus must come first before Christ will present the confessor's name in His role as High Priest to the Father in heaven (Matt. 10:32-33). Ultimately everyone will confess the name of Jesus Christ, but only those who do so following faith and repentance and before baptism and death receive the blessings of this public vow of allegiance to Him.
........"All hail the power of Jesus' name; let angels prostrate fall... Ye chosen seed of Israel's race, ye ransomed from the fall; hail Him who saves you by His grace, the crowned King, Lord of All…"



A Life Filled With Testing

By Kent E. Heaton, Sr.

........The story is told of the blacksmith known for his strong faith that had a great deal of illness. He was challenged by an unbeliever to explain why his God would let him suffer. He explained, "I take a piece of iron, put it into the fire to bring it to a white heat, then I strike it once or twice to see if it will take temper. I plunge it into water to change the temperature, put it into the fire again, and then I put it on the anvil and make a useful article out of it."
........"If it will not take temper when I first strike it on the anvil, I throw it into the scrap heap and sell it for a half-penny per pound. I believe God has been testing me to see if I will take temper. I have tried to bear it as patiently as I could, and my daily prayer has been, 'Lord, put me into the fire if you will; put me into the water if you think I need it; do anything you please, O Lord, only do not throw me on the scrap heap.'"
There are many trials that afflict us in life. The apostle Paul describes the struggles of life in 2Corinthians 5:1-8 as groaning in an earthly house. Paul knew firsthand the difficulty of suffering as he had pleaded with the Lord to remove his "thorn in the flesh" (2Cor. 12:7-10). The Lord told him he would have to endure his thorn and allow the grace of God to sustain him.
........I suspect that what Paul wrote in chapter five was closely related to what he experienced in chapter twelve. He groaned under the burden of his physical body but he knew that Jehovah had promised a "habitation which is from heaven" (2Cor. 5:2). To walk by faith is to look beyond the anguish of the test of fire here to the blessing of being present with the Lord. It takes eyes of faith to be able to look beyond the here and now and embrace our citizenship in heaven. "Wherefore we faint not; but though our outward man is decaying, yet our inward man is renewed day by day. For our light affliction, which is for the moment, worketh for us more and more exceedingly an eternal weight of glory; while we look not at the things which are seen, but at the things which are not seen: for the things which are seen are temporal; but the things which are not seen are eternal" (2Cor. 4:16-18).
........Paul had his share of being put in the fire and often was placed in the cool water. These things were of little importance to the life of Paul as he disciplined his body to bring it into subjection to completion of his race in life (1Cor. 9:24-27). The Lord put Paul on the anvil of life to make a useful tool of him. "If so be that we suffer with him, that we may be also glorified with him. For I reckon that the sufferings of this present time are not worthy to be compared with the glory which shall be revealed to us-ward" (Rom. 8:17-18).
Life is not without suffering. The joy of heaven would be diminished if we experienced life without suffering. How meaningful is Revelation 21:4 when we look to the day when God takes away our tears, our sorrows, our crying, our pain and death. It shows the love of God for mortal man as he suffers in the flesh below. While life is sometimes thrown into the fire and sometimes thrown into the cool water, when the Lord finishes with our life on the anvil of time, we will made into a beautiful ornament of His choosing in the eternal home He has prepared. "Blessed is the man that endureth temptation; for when he hath been approved, he shall receive the crown of life, which the Lord promised to them that love him" (James 1:12). ............................... Top of Page .....

 
 
November 2 , 2003
     
EPAPHRODITUS
By Paul R. Blake
Stolen Car
(Author: Unknown)
EPAPHRODITUS
By Paul R. Blake

"With No Thought For Himself"

........One cannot help but like Epaphroditus. He's one of those seldom noticed, infrequently mentioned, self effacing heroes, who, working together single-mindedly with others like himself, spread the gospel throughout the whole world in 31 years. It is evident that Paul liked him, too. The imprisoned apostle calls Epaphroditus "my brother," describing him with such intense terms of praise as to leaveno doubt about Paul's deep respect and affection for him. Paul's characterizations of him as worker and warrior, messenger and minister give insight into his unselfish, considerate nature (Phil. 2:25). This devout man who took no thought for himself and focused only on serving others becomes our model of quiet toil for Christ. He is worthy of admiration and imitation.

Worker
........There are few awards for the common laborer. Managers and foremen get production bonuses and honors at the company dinner, while the laborers stand day after day sweating in assembly lines, unknown, and unsung. However, it is the combined efforts of these persistent, loyal workers that form the backbone of the business. In the kingdom, the apostles' names are remembered by everyone, but who talks about Epaphroditus, Tychicus, or Onesiphorus? But how much more difficult would the apostle's task of preaching thegospel to every creature without the quiet, unselfish services of hundreds of seldom noticed people like Epaphroditus.

Warrior
........The soldier's life is not an easy one. He gives up a peaceful home life in a quiet neighborhood in exchange for unpleasant accommodations near the battle front. He trades good food and leisure time for uncertain fare and guard duty. He puts himself in harm's way enduring hardship, because a soldier must fight for another. He dies so that others might live. Epaphroditus risked his life to wait on Paul, leaving the comfort of his home in Philippi to hazard his life and health seeing to Paul's needs in prison.

Messenger
........A messenger typifies the true servant of the Savior. He is not the author of the message. Another gets the credit for the information it contains. He is not the recipient of the message. Someone else benefits from the contents of the missive. The messenger just carries it from one to the other, braving the trials along the path, fearing the displeasure of the sender if he fails, and risking the anger of the receiver who may despise the message. Epaphroditus cared so much for those who would receive the message that it troubled him to hear they were worried for his health. In his estimation, his own physical state was too unimportant to concern others (Phil 2:26).

Minister
.......As Epaphroditus ministered to Paul's needs on behalf of the Philippians, he did so at the expense of his own health (Phil. 2:30). He understood that ministering to another required sacrifice; it meant that the minister must place greater value on the needs of his charge than on his own interests. This attitude reflects the character of Jesus who ministered to the spiritual needs of all men. Humankind's need for salvation was more important to Him than His own desire to remain in heaven with the Father. Man's liberty was a greater matter to Him than His own freedom from suffering and humiliation. To Him, new life for the lost outweighed His own potential loss of life. Epaphroditus walked in the steps of the Savior. Whether one ministers by waiting at another's bedside or exhorts from a pulpit, one can profit by thinking less of what he is due and focusing more on what he can do.
........Epaphroditus took no thought for himself. In so doing, he became a living example of the words of the Lord: "But whosoever will be great among you, shall be your minister: for even the Son of man came not to be ministered unto, but to minister, and to give his life a ransom for many" (Mark 10:43, 45). Christians have been born anew, not to be waited on by others, but to wait upon others, not to be honored by men, but to give honor to God."Receive him therefore in the Lord with all gladness; and hold such in reputation" (Phil. 2:29).

Stolen Car
(Author: Unknown)

........The light turns green, but the man doesn't notice. The woman waits, but the man doesn't notice the light change. The woman begins pounding on her steering wheel and yelling at the man to move. The man doesn't move. The woman is going ballistic inside her car, ranting and raving at the man, pounding on her steering wheel and dash. The light turns yellow. The woman begins to blow the car horn and scream curses at the man. The man, hearing the commotion, looks up, sees the yellow light and accelerates through the intersection just as the light turned red.
........The woman is beside herself, screaming in frustration as she misses her chance to get through the intersection. As she is still in mid-rant she hears a tap on her window and looks up into the barrel of a gun held by a very serious looking policeman. The policeman tells her to shut off her car while keeping both hands in sight. She complies, speechless at what is happening. After she shuts off the engine, the policeman orders her to exit her car with her hands up. She gets out of the car and he orders her to turn and place her hands on her car. She turns, places her hands on the car roof and quickly is cuffed and hustled into the patrol car. She is too bewildered by the chain of events to ask any questions and is driven to the police station where she is fingerprinted, photographed, searched, booked and placed in a cell.
........After a couple of hours, a policeman approaches the cell and opens the door for her. She is escorted back to the booking desk where the original officer is waiting with her personal effects. He hands her the bag containing her things, and says, "I'm really sorry for this mistake. But you see, I pulled up behind your car while you were blowing your horn and cussing a blue streak at the car in front of you and then I noticed the "Choose Life" license plateholder and the "Follow Me to Sunday School" bumper sticker and the chrome plated Christian fish emblem on the trunk, so naturally I assumed you had stolen the car.

 
 
November 9, 2003
     

.........The goodness of God is declared in many scriptures (Ex. 34:6-7; Psalm 25:8; 31:19; 33:5; 34:8; 52:1; 73:1; 86:5; 100:5; 103:8; 119:68; 145:8-9; Lam. 3:25; Acts 14:17). To say that God is good is to make an assessment
about His perfect nature. Nothing is lacking in God. His goodness is perfect; nothing can be added to make His goodness better. The name God, in English, comes from the term "good." The original Saxon meaning of the English word God is "The Good." The Hebrew term for "good" that is descriptive of God's perfect character is also translated into English by such varied terms as merciful, kindly, loving kindness, favor.

.........Created things and beings are declared good by God (Gen. 1:4, 10, 12, 18, 21, 25, 31). Although the goodness of creation is derived from God, God's goodness is inherent in the essence of His very being. Hence, Jesus could declare that "no one is good but One, that is, God" (Matt. 19:17; Mark 10:18). God is not defined in terms of goodness, but rather goodness is defined by the nature of God.

.........People observe the goodness of God because experiences with Him demonstrate that his activity is good. Psalm 107 provides such an observation. The central theme of Psalm 107 is that God is good. Because the Psalmist had experienced the goodness of God, he could exhort, "Oh, give thanks to the Lord, for He is good! For His mercy endures forever" (Psalm 107:1, 106:1; 118:1; 136:1; 1Chron. 16:34). This exhortation to give thanks was specifically addressed to the redeemed who had been recipients of the goodness of God, i.e., thus, "Let the redeemed of the Lord say so" (Psalm 107:2). This psalm declares that God is good because he redeemed his people "from the hand of the enemy" and gathered them "out of the lands, from the east and from the west, from the north and from the south" (vs 2-3). These specifics regarding redemption have influenced many scholars to believe that Psalm 107 was written when the Israelites were in Babylonian exile. Even so, the message of this psalm has universal application.

.........Psalm 107 is divided into seven sections. After the introductory exhortation (vs 1-3), the next four sections portray how God, in His goodness, redeemed His people. He delivered them out of the wilderness (vs 4-9). He broke the bonds of prisoners (vs 10-16). He restored the sick (vs 17-22). And He showed his power to mariners in the sea (vs 23-32). The sixth section declares that God is good in his governance of nature and human events (vs 33-42). The last section indicates that the wise will observe and understand God's loving kindness (v 43).

.........The Psalmist describes God's goodness in terms of redemption and governance. God's goodness is evident because He redeems his people from their perils. Four times the plight of God's people is described (vs 4-5; 10-12; 17-18; 23-27). Each time "they cried out to the Lord in their trouble" (vs 6, 13, 19, 28). Each time God delivered His people (vs 6-7; 13-14; 19; 28). Each time the Psalmist expressed his desire, "Oh, that men would give thanks to the LORD for His goodness, And for His wonderful works to the children of men!" (vs 8, 15, 21, 31). And each time a description is given about God's blessings to those who had cried out to him (vs 9, 16; 20, 29-30).

.........The Psalmists observes that God's goodness is evident in his governance over nature and human events. He declares that God has power to turn "rivers into a wilderness, and the water springs into dry ground; A fruitful land into barrenness." This He does because of "the wickedness of those who dwell in it" (vs 33-34). Conversely, God can turn "a wilderness into pools of water, and dry land into water springs." (v 35). The implication is that in this way God rewards the righteous who dwell there. "There He makes the hungry dwell, that they may establish a city for a dwelling place, and sow fields and plant vineyards, that they may yield a fruitful harvest. He also blessesthem, and they multiply greatly; and He does not let their cattle decrease" (vs 36-38). The prophet Nahum expressed a similar thought, "The LORD is good, A stronghold in the day of trouble; And He knows those who trust in Him" (Nahum 1:7).

.........God is just in his governance over humanity. When the righteous "are diminished and brought low through oppression, affliction and sorrow, He pours contempt on princes, And causes them to wander in the wilderness where there is no way; yet He sets the poor on high, far from affliction, And makes their families like a flock" (vs 39-41).

.........All who are righteous respond to God's goodness by recognizing it and ceasing from iniquity (v 42). Finally, the Psalmist declares that "whoever is wise will observe these things, and they will understand the loving kindness of the Lord" (v 43).

.........Many other scriptures also declare God's goodness. A panoramic overview of the Old and New Testaments indicates that God's goodness is made known by His activity. God's goodness is demonstrated in creation and in His provisions for all living creatures (Psalms 145:8-9; Acts 14:17; James 1:17). His goodness is observed in his providential care (Gen. 28:8, 14; 1Kings 17:9) and guidance (Gen. 50:20) of those who love and trust Him (Psalm 34:8; Ezra 8:22; Rom. 8:28). God's goodness is also indicated by His statutes (Psalm 119:64, 68).

.........God's goodness is supremely manifested in His redemption of believers from their sins. Through the Law of
Moses and the Levitical priesthood, God provided atonement for the sins of Israelites (Ex. 29:36; Lev. 6:7; Deut.
32:43; Prov. 16:6). "Good and upright is the LORD; Therefoe He teaches sinners in the way" (Psalm 25:8). "For You, Lord, are good, and ready to forgive, And abundant in mercy to all those who call upon You" (Psalm 86:5).

.........No where is God's goodness more greatly demonstrated than in the giving of his Son (Luke 2:10-11; John 3:16) to redeem believers from their sins (Rom. 5:6-8; Titus 2:11). Eternal redemption is through the blood of Jesus Christ (Rom. 3:24; 1Cor. 1:30; Eph. 1:7; Col. 1:14; Heb. 9:12, 15). This salvation is made known through the gospel (Mark 1:1, 15; Luke 4:18; Rom. 1:16; Eph. 1:13; 3:6; 1Tim. 1:11; 2Tim. 1:10).

.........If the Psalmist, who lived before God's eternal plan of redemption had been disclosed, had reason to thank God for his goodness, (and he did) surely we, to whom that plan of eternal redemption has now been made available, should have greater reason to thank God for his goodness. "Or do you despise the riches of His goodness, forbearance, and longsuffering, not knowing that the goodness of God leads you to repentance?" (Rom. 2:4; 2Peter 3:9). Recognition of God's goodness should prompt thanksgiving, praise, love and obedience. "We love Him because He first loved us" (1John 4:19). Therefore, "give thanks to the LORD, for He is good! For His mercy endures forever. Let the redeemed of the LORD say so" (Psalm 107:1-2). We can thank God not only for redemption from various plights in this life, as did the Psalmist, but also, like angels in heaven, we can thank God for his goodness in providing eternal redemption (Rev. 7:9-12). (11/03)

Top of Page

 

 
 
November 16, 2003
     

"I Can't Believe My Mother Died Lost!"
By Kevin Kay

.........I'm trying to respond in the best way I can to the emotional argument: "If I accept what you teach, I'll be condemning my mother who was such a fine person but died without being baptized."
Everyone, not just you but everyone, has to wrestle with the consequences of Bible teaching, especially as it impacts our family and friends that we love so much. As we wrestle with this, there are several facts that we dare not ignore.
.........First, if the Bible is really God's word (2Tim. 3:16-17)and the pattern that we are to follow and hold fast (2Tim.1:13), then we must be a "people of the book" (Isa. 8:20).
......... Second, if we are to be a "people of the book," then we must accept whatever God's word teaches (1Thes. 2:13), and we must also accept whatever the consequences of that teaching might be.
.........Third, whatever the NT teaches about any subject, it taught 2,000 years ago when it was first written, long before your loved ones or my loved ones were born.
.........Fourth, whatever the NT teaches about any subject, it teaches whether you or I or our loved ones believe it and obey it or not.
.........Fifth, the NT teaches that the majority of people will be lost (Matt. 7:13-14). That number will include many sincere, religious people (Matt. 7:21-23; Luke 13:22-30), and it will necessarily include the loved ones of some Christians. I say that, because Jesus prophesied that the gospel would make enemies of some family members (Matt. 10:34-36). The apostle Paul mourned the unsaved condition of his countrymen, the Jews (Rom. 10:1-3).
.........Sixth, the eternal destiny of the dead is sealed at death(Heb. 9:27). Paul said: "For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ, that each one may receive the things done in the body, according to what he has done, whether good or bad" (2Cor. 5:10). After the rich man and Lazarus died, their destinies were sealed. Lazarus was in "Abraham's bosom" and the rich man was in torment(Luke 16:22-23), and there was nothing that they or anyone else could say or do to change that (Luke 16:24-26). This means that nothing that any of us might say, or believe, or do will have any effect on our loved ones condition.
.........If your loved one is saved, it will not be because you or anyone else might say or believe that he's saved. If your loved one is lost, it will not be because you or anyone else might happen to say or believe that he's lost. If your loved one is saved, he is saved regardless of anything that you or anyone else might believe or say or do. If your loved one is lost, he is lost regardless of anything that you or anyone else might believe or say or do.
.........Seventh, final judgment is in the hands of the Lord. The NT clearly teaches that God will judge the world, through His Son Jesus (John 5:26-27; Matt. 25:31-33), and He will judge the world in righteousness (Acts 17:30-31). That means that He's not going to make any mistakes (Gen. 18:25). That means that those who should go to heaven will and those who shouldn't go to heaven will not. Jesus will be a just and a merciful Judge. I am not the judge, Jesus is. You are not the judge, Jesus is. Since I am not the judge, I cannot give anyone 100% assurance of their accountable loved ones eternal state. I can't do that because it is not my prerogative (1Cor. 4:3-5). I can't do that because on Judgment Day the secrets of the heart will be judged (Rom.2:16), and I don't know those secrets you don't either.
.........Eighth, your loved ones' condition at death doesn't change Bible teaching. The psalmist says: "Forever, O Lord, Your word is settled in heaven (Psa. 119:89). That means that the plan of salvation hasn't changed (Mark 16:15-16), what the NT says about morality (1Cor. 6:9 10), obedience (Heb. 5:8-9; 2 Thes. 1:8-9), worship (Matt. 15:7-9), and faithfulness (Ezek. 18:24, 26; Col. 1:23; Heb. 10:38), is still the same. The Bible still says that we must love God more than anyone or anything else (Luke 14:26). The dead will be judged by Christ's words (John 12:48).
.........Ninth, I believe that the Lawgiver has the right to make exceptions to His law. The penalty for adultery under the old covenant was death by stoning (John 8:3-5), but that penalty was not exacted in David's case (2Sam. 12:13). One might argue that it was not exacted because of technicalities -- David and Bathsheba were not "caught in the act" (Deut. 22:22) -- but I tend to think that it is an example of the Lawgiver making an exception to His law. Having said this, I must also hasten to say that I cannot say that God definitely will make exceptions to His law on Judgment Day and I will not say that God certainly will not make exceptions to His law on Judgment Day. But we must not presume upon the mercy of God (emphasis mine - prb). If God chooses to make exceptions to His law, that will be fine with me, and if God chooses not to make exceptions to His law, I must accept that. (It is important to note that nowhere in the scriptures does God promise to make exceptions to the law of Christ; Acts 17:30 - prb)
.........Tenth, your dead loved ones want you to be saved. If your loved one is now in the "bosom of Abraham" like Lazarus, what he wants most of all is for you to be saved, and if your loved one is in torment, like the rich man, what he wants most of all is for you to be saved (Luke 16:27-28). And the only way that you can be saved is by hearing and heeding the word of God (Luke 16:29-31). If your loved one was honestly mistaken and died without fully obeying the gospel, would he want you to refuse to do better after learning better, simply out of love and loyalty to him? Brother Bill Hall has observed: "We are reminded of the son who took over his father's store after the father died. Later, when told by authorities that he was not giving good measure for a yard of material, he was insulted. 'My father ran this store before me, and used this very measure,' he said; 'Are you saying my father was dishonest?' 'No,' the other man said; 'I'm quite sure that your father thought this to be an accurate measure; but if you continue to use it after being shown its inaccuracy, then you are dishonest.' So it is in religion if we do not change upon learning the truth." ("I Would Be Condemning My Parents," The Westview Weekly, March 11, 1990, 10:8:3). What if your loved one died without obeying the gospel, but somehow God in His mercy saves him because he didn't know what you have learned, will that excuse you if you fail to do what you have learned you must do?
.........Eleventh, Christ demands that we love Him more than anyone or anything else (Matt. 10:37; Luke 14:26).




 
 
November 23, 2003
     

Withdrawing From Non-Attenders.
Steve Wallace

........"Church discipline" is part of God's plan to restore erring Christians (Gal. 6:1; 1Thes. 5:14; 2Thes. 3:6). A question frequently asked is, "What about when a Christian stops attending services?" No one denies that such is sin (Heb. 2:3; 10:25). Further, so far as we know, everyone agrees that we should try to restore one in such a state (Gal. 6:1). The subject of this article deals with our responsibilities in the event that the erring brother or sister fails to respond to this effort at restoration. What does the Bible say we should do in such cases?
.........1. Christians have responsibilities to brethren beyond the local church. One example of this is seen in Gal. 2:7, 9. Paul and Barnabas were given "the right hands of fellowship" by Peter, James and John. In other words, they were commended by these brethren, and this in spite of the fact that Paul and Barnabas did not belong to the same local church as did Peter, James and John. Commendation is one obligation we have to faithful brethren who are not members where we worship. What if the church at Jerusalem had decided to support Paul and Barnabas in their missionary efforts? Such support is an extension of fellowship beyond the local church level (Phil 4:15, ASV). What if Paul or Barnabas taught error and became unworthy? A local church who knew of them and their teaching could rightly "mark and avoid" them in spite of their not being members of that church (Rom. 16:17-18). There are at least three reasons for such an action: To make sure that local church or its members did not (1) support them (Phil. 4:15), (2) commend them (Gal. 2:7, 9; Acts 18:27), or (3) receive them (2John 9-11). What we have said under this point is noteworthy because it shows that members of a local church have responsibilities toward known, unworthy non-member Christians. We now turn to a popular argument with regards to our subject.
......... 2. What is the significance of "among you" in 1 Cor. 5? We ask this question for the following reason. Brethren who deny that a church can withdraw from Christians who quit attending argue, "In the New Testament, every time a church withdrew from someone, the offending party was in attendance at the local church." This comes from the belief that the words "among you" in 1 Cor. 5:1 mean, "In attendance at the church there." The verse reads, "It is actually reported that there is fornication among you, and such fornication as is not even found among the Gentiles, that one of you hath his father's wife" (1 Cor. 5:1, my emphasis, sw). "Among the Gentiles" does not mean "in the churches of the Gentiles." Rather, it clearly means "among their association, among those they mix with." In light of this clear contextual meaning of "among," the fornicator may or may not have been in attendance at Corinth. His not being in attendance is seen to be at least possible when one considers the solution to this situation which Paul commanded in vs. 9-13 (see next paragraph, below). However, this is an aside from our main point here which simply is this: "Among you" clearly has a broader meaning than some brethren would have us believe. Moving along in our text we see that v. 2 speaks of this sinner being "taken away from among you." The word for "among" here is the same one used in 2Thes. 3:7 where it speaks of Paul's association with the brethren at Thessalonica, which also may include his time in their assemblies but is clearly broader than this. In light of these facts, the contention that "among you" means the offending party was attending services is not born out by the words of the proof text. Nor is it born out by the remedy Paul seeks when he tells them to "deliver such a one unto Satan" (v. 5). What did he mean by this? He went on to tell them "not to keep company" with such a brother and to "put away that wicked man from among yourselves" (vs. 11, 13). These terms explain "deliver to Satan" of verse five. However, they also tell us something more about the words "among you." The word "company" of verse 11 also appears in verses 9-10 where it is used of the kind of company one keeps with those of the world. Please notice again that, while this may include associations in assemblies of the local church, it is clearly broader than this. Paul says that they are not to have this kind of company with an erring brother, "no not to eat" (v. 11). This is also broader than the assemblies as Paul forbids them to eat at the place where they assembled (11:22). Thayer defines the word rendered "company" as, "to mix up together, to keep company with, be intimate with" (p. 601).
This word also appears in 2Thes. 3:14 where it is used inconjunction with "withdraw yourselves" in 2Thes. 3:6. Putting all this together we conclude that Paul is telling them to cut off social contact with the person, to subject him to social exile. From this brief study we see that the contention that withdrawal is only to be carried out when the offender is in attendance lacks support from a passage to which its advocates appeal. Further, as we put words together we see a significant similarity in the words "deliver such a one unto Satan," "not to keep company," "put away the wick-ed man from among yourselves," "withdraw" and "mark and avoid" (Rom. 16:17-18). They all speak of nearly identical, if not identical, actions which, while having applications in the assemblies of the local church, are broader than this. With this fact in mind and the meaning of "withdraw" fixed we are now ready to look at a familiar argument.
......... 3. "You can't withdraw from someone who has already withdrawn themselves." This argument sounds logical on the surface. However, it breaks down upon investigation. Both times the word"withdraw" is used in the above sentence it has a different meaning. The following rendering demonstrates this truth: "You can't withdraw from (socially exile) someone who has already withdrawn (quit attending services) themselves." If someone quit (withdrew from) my baseball team could I refuse to have anything to do with (socially exile) them? Of course I could! (I speak of what is possible and not what would be proper behavior.) The above contention (point 3.) depends on the ambiguous use of "withdraw" and also is without foundation in scripture. As we established above, brethren have responsibilities to Christians beyond the local church and a member who quits attending services is certainly walking disorderly. Hence, such a one should be withdrawn from if other efforts to restore him fail. But can we learn anything from these other efforts at restoring such a one? Please read on.
......... 4. What does "church discipline" include? I have never heard of anyone who says that we should not visit and admonish a Christian who quits attending services. Such is in harmony with 2Tim. 2: 24-26. The word "instructing" appears in verse 25 ("correcting" ASV). It is defined, "1.The whole training and education of children, 2. Whatever in adults also cultivates the soul, especially by correcting mistakes and curbing the passions; hence a) instruction which aims at the increase of virtue b) according to biblical usage chastisement, chastening" (Thayer p 473). It is rendered "discipline" in Eph. 6:4 in the NASV. When we try to restore someone we are disciplining them. This word (for "instructing," 2Tim. 2:25) also appears in 1Tim. 1:20 and is rendered "may learn." We established above that "deliver to Satan" in this verse is used of withdrawal or social exile (1Cor. 5:5, 11, 13). Hence, we see that whether we go and admonish a non-attender or withdraw from him, the church is exercising discipline in either case. It is hard for me to see how one can defend the former practice (as most do) and then argue against the latter.
......... The Bible says that local churches have a responsibility to discipline members who fall into sin. The arguments which would make a distinction in the church's responsibility towards those guilty of other sins and those guilty of quitting attending are not valid. Hence, a church has an obligation to withdraw from members who quit attending after other efforts to restore such brethren have failed.


 
November 30, 2003
     
 

A Bittersweet Good-bye
By Steven Harper

........When the apostle Paul came to the city of Ephesus, he met some disciples who knew only of the baptism of John. Upon asking them if they had received the Holy Spirit when they believed, they indicated they had never even heard of the Holy Spirit (Acts 19:2). It was then that Paul asked about their baptism and, finding they did not know of the need to believe in Jesus, Paul taught them and they were then baptized in the name of the Lord (vv. 3, 4). After teaching and baptizing these 12 men, Paul laid hands on them and they received the Holy Spirit and then spoke in tongues [different languages] and prophesied (vv. 5, 6). Paul remained in Ephesus and taught in the synagogue for three months about the kingdom of God (v. 8), and his teaching evidently riled some who were there because their hearts became hardened against the truth and they began to speak evil of the way of Christ. This conflict led Paul to depart and withdraw the disciples from them and he then began teaching daily in the school of Tyrannus (v. 9). Paul remained in Ephesus for a period of about two years after this (v. 10), and no doubt became very familiar with, and very close to, the brethren there.
........Paul was working some unusual miracles by God's power in Ephesus, to the point that people would bring handkerchiefs or aprons from his body to the sick that they might be healed (vv. 11, 12). Paul's influence was great in the city of Ephesus and the surrounding region, and it was said that one particular miracle "became known to all Jews and Greeks dwelling in Ephesus," and "the name of the Lord Jesus was magnified" (v. 17). Many who had formerly practiced magic [sorcery] were converted and burned their books in the sight of all (v. 19). We are then told "the word of the Lord grew mightily and prevailed" in the region (v. 20), and who could doubt it? Paul's efforts were so successful that the silversmiths who made a living off of the people's idolatry began to complain, and they eventually rioted (vv. 21-41). By their own words, Paul's teaching and works were reaching out and affecting the people "not only at Ephesus, but throughout almost all Asia" (v. 26). It was only after this riot in the theater that Paul decided to leave the brethren there and go into Macedonia and Greece (20:1, 2).
........And when Paul was determined to return to Jerusalem for Pentecost, he traveled by way of the city of Miletus [the SW edge of Asia Minor on the Aegean Sea, about 20 miles from Ephesus] and called for the elders of the church in Ephesus to come to him. After some serious talk about the coming dangers (Acts 20:18-35), Paul gave a final admonition to take heed to themselves, to watch the flock among them (v. 28), and to not forget the greater blessing of giving to others in need (v. 35). When it was time to go, "they all wept freely, and fell on Paul's neck and kissed him, sorrowing most of all for the words which he spoke, that they would see his face no more." (vv. 37, 38)
........No doubt, this must have been a bittersweet good-bye. Paul had done much good for them and the region, but they knew he was going to be doing more of the same as he would continue to preach the word of salvation to lost souls. They could say 'good-bye' with happiness because they knew his reason for leaving was a good thing. But, at the same time, to hear that they would never see him again face to face must have been sorrowful because of their close friendship and because of their common fellowship in Christ. It is never easy to say the final 'good-bye' to ones we love so dearly.
........About 13-1/2 years ago, I held a newborn girl in my arms just hours after she was born. She wasn't mine, but I was honored to be one of the first ones to hold her, and I admit she held a special place in my heart forever after that day. That was a memorable day for me, personally, because before that day I had never even held a newborn. I was always afraid I would break them or squeeze them too tightly, so I never even volunteered. That little girl's name was Kendice Rene Mackey.
........Just about six years ago, her mother called me to let me and my wife know that Kendice had just been diagnosed with a disease I could barely pronounce, and one about which I knew nothing. I had to look it up just to know how to spell it, and to know what it meant. The disease was called metachromatic leukodystrophy (MLD). That's a pretty big word for such a small girl! It broke my heart to find out that this was a debilitating disease that would slowly take away her motor skills and her ability to speak, would take away her mental capacity, and would eventually take away her life. This precious little girl I had held just a few short years earlier in my arms would eventually be taken away by some horrible disease that would force her parents to watch her slowly slip away. I could not imagine her parents' pain when they heard the news, or how they would face what was coming.
........But Rob and Linda Mackey did the right thing. Right away, they set their minds to react as Christians should react to such news: They did not blame God for this terrible disease; they did not wallow in self-pity; they did not quit serving the Lord because they thought it was 'unfair' that faithful Christians had been stricken with such a horrible fate. Rob and Linda determined to pray that Kendice would not suffer, and asked their many friends to join with them in doing so. [She was in our family's prayers daily.] They determined that they would not get depressed and they would focus on the positive aspects of her life and show the world they truly had a hope beyond the pains and sorrows of this world. And they did just that. They adjusted to the life that they had been dealt and shone as examples for us all.
........I remember visiting the Mackeys on a couple of occasions after Kendice was diagnosed - only after I made sure my own attitude was right before I got there. Every time I visited, I left feeling happier than when I got there! I would watch Kendice's face light up when her dad, Rob, would walk in the door. I watched her mom, Linda, treat her with the utmost respect and love, never complaining about the burden she had been given to bear [though I am sure she had plenty of opportunities], and she was always encouraging Kendice [and - unknowingly - us]. Her parents' positive attitude overflowed to Kendice's younger sisters, Nikki and Erica Beth, too. They loved their sister dearly and would do anything for her! They did not abandon their sister in her illness, but probably got closer to her than ever.
........I and my son visited the Mackeys this past April, on the way to a gospel meeting in Stillwater, Oklahoma. I didn't tell the Mackeys that the day I was there was my 40th birthday because I was giving myself a birthday present. I also wanted my son to make them the focus. They deserved it. And it was the best present I could have had. We saw another truly happy family whose trust was firmly in God and His promises. We saw parents who truly loved their children and who were raising them in the nurture and admonition of the Lord. We saw children who respected their parents and who also loved the Lord and one another. We saw a family dealing with adversity as every Christian should: with perseverance, trust and hope. I never thanked them for that day.
........On November 12, I got a phone call from Linda again. This time, she told me, "Kendice went to heaven last night." I am not ashamed to tell you I cried. I knew that day was coming, but I never really wanted to hear that it had arrived. But, I was also happy for Kendice because she would not have to suffer from this terrible disease any longer. It was a bittersweet good-bye, but now she is enjoying an existence we can only now imagine.
........Thank you, Rob and Linda, for your indescribable example for the rest of us. Thank you for showing us what it means to live. Nikki and Erica Beth: she couldn't have had better sisters. Thank you all for showing us what it means to walk by faith and not by sight. We will miss Kendice, but we'll see her again.
Wouldn't you like to meet her?

Top of Page