| |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
October 2003: 26
and November 2003: 2, 9,
16, 23, 30
|
| |
|
"A
Name Which Is Above Every Name"
By Paul R. Blake |
A
Life Filled With Testing
By Kent E. Heaton, Sr. |
"A
Name Which Is Above Every Name"
By Paul R. Blake
........"Therefore
God also has highly exalted Him and given Him the
name which is above every name, 10 that at the name
of Jesus every knee should bow, of those in heaven,
and of those on earth, and of those under the earth,
11 and that every tongue should confess that Jesus
Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father"
(Phil. 2:9-11).
........It is testimony
to the high justice of God that following the voluntary,
deep humiliation of Jesus that the Father would highly
exalt him. As low as Jesus was brought in obedience
to God by coming in the form of a servant and dying
in a shameful manner, so high would He be exalted
when He completed the task of the salvation of humankind.
A Great Name
........The names of
all righteous men would pale into insignificance beside
the glorious name of Jesus Christ. Abraham who was
the father of the Jewish race, ancestor of the Savior,
and model of faith for all men in all times would
not be as important as that of Christ. Moses who was
leader and lawgiver to the people of God, the prince
who became a prophet, and the man who was the most
humble of all men, would fade at the coming of the
carpenter's son born in a manger, Who was revealed
to be the Son of God and by means of a bloody cross
and an open tomb, became King of kings and Lord of
lords. Peter attempted to set up worship stations
for Jesus, Moses, and Elijah; and God stopped him
with the words, "This is My beloved Son, in whom
I am well pleased. Hear Him!" (Matt. 17:4-5).
No name in all of history has impacted this world
as that of Jesus Christ.
A Powerful Name
........The name of Jesus
Christ bears all authority in this world. He was given
all authority by God (Matt. 28:18); and therefore,
all spiritual activities of Christians must be in
the name of (or by the authority of) Jesus Christ
(Col. 3:17). In all matters of the work, worship,
and organization of the Church, Jesus Christ is the
last word in authority and preeminence (Col. 1:18).
All matters of religious doctrine must bear the hallmark
of the name of Jesus Christ, for only His doctrine
forms the basis of fellowship among believers (2John
9-11); doctrines created by and named after men only
bring damnation and division.
The Name of Salvation
........The name of Jesus
Christ is the only name through which one can access
salvation from sins and eternal life (Acts 4:12).
His name must be publicly confessed before the penitent
believer can be washed of his sins in baptism (Rom.
10:9-10; Acts 8:37-38). Public confession of the name
of Jesus must come first before Christ will present
the confessor's name in His role as High Priest to
the Father in heaven (Matt. 10:32-33). Ultimately
everyone will confess the name of Jesus Christ, but
only those who do so following faith and repentance
and before baptism and death receive the blessings
of this public vow of allegiance to Him.
........"All hail
the power of Jesus' name; let angels prostrate fall...
Ye chosen seed of Israel's race, ye ransomed from
the fall; hail Him who saves you by His grace, the
crowned King, Lord of All
"
A Life Filled With Testing
By Kent E. Heaton, Sr.
........The story is
told of the blacksmith known for his strong faith
that had a great deal of illness. He was challenged
by an unbeliever to explain why his God would let
him suffer. He explained, "I take a piece of
iron, put it into the fire to bring it to a white
heat, then I strike it once or twice to see if it
will take temper. I plunge it into water to change
the temperature, put it into the fire again, and then
I put it on the anvil and make a useful article out
of it."
........"If it will
not take temper when I first strike it on the anvil,
I throw it into the scrap heap and sell it for a half-penny
per pound. I believe God has been testing me to see
if I will take temper. I have tried to bear it as
patiently as I could, and my daily prayer has been,
'Lord, put me into the fire if you will; put me into
the water if you think I need it; do anything you
please, O Lord, only do not throw me on the scrap
heap.'"
There are many trials that afflict us in life. The
apostle Paul describes the struggles of life in 2Corinthians
5:1-8 as groaning in an earthly house. Paul knew firsthand
the difficulty of suffering as he had pleaded with
the Lord to remove his "thorn in the flesh"
(2Cor. 12:7-10). The Lord told him he would have to
endure his thorn and allow the grace of God to sustain
him.
........I suspect that
what Paul wrote in chapter five was closely related
to what he experienced in chapter twelve. He groaned
under the burden of his physical body but he knew
that Jehovah had promised a "habitation which
is from heaven" (2Cor. 5:2). To walk by faith
is to look beyond the anguish of the test of fire
here to the blessing of being present with the Lord.
It takes eyes of faith to be able to look beyond the
here and now and embrace our citizenship in heaven.
"Wherefore we faint not; but though our outward
man is decaying, yet our inward man is renewed day
by day. For our light affliction, which is for the
moment, worketh for us more and more exceedingly an
eternal weight of glory; while we look not at the
things which are seen, but at the things which are
not seen: for the things which are seen are temporal;
but the things which are not seen are eternal"
(2Cor. 4:16-18).
........Paul had his
share of being put in the fire and often was placed
in the cool water. These things were of little importance
to the life of Paul as he disciplined his body to
bring it into subjection to completion of his race
in life (1Cor. 9:24-27). The Lord put Paul on the
anvil of life to make a useful tool of him. "If
so be that we suffer with him, that we may be also
glorified with him. For I reckon that the sufferings
of this present time are not worthy to be compared
with the glory which shall be revealed to us-ward"
(Rom. 8:17-18).
Life is not without suffering. The joy of heaven would
be diminished if we experienced life without suffering.
How meaningful is Revelation 21:4 when we look to
the day when God takes away our tears, our sorrows,
our crying, our pain and death. It shows the love
of God for mortal man as he suffers in the flesh below.
While life is sometimes thrown into the fire and sometimes
thrown into the cool water, when the Lord finishes
with our life on the anvil of time, we will made into
a beautiful ornament of His choosing in the eternal
home He has prepared. "Blessed is the man that
endureth temptation; for when he hath been approved,
he shall receive the crown of life, which the Lord
promised to them that love him" (James 1:12).
...............................
Top of Page
.....
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
EPAPHRODITUS
By Paul R. Blake
"With No Thought For Himself"
........One
cannot help but like Epaphroditus. He's one of those
seldom noticed, infrequently mentioned, self effacing
heroes, who, working together single-mindedly with
others like himself, spread the gospel throughout
the whole world in 31 years. It is evident that
Paul liked him, too. The imprisoned apostle calls
Epaphroditus "my brother," describing
him with such intense terms of praise as to leaveno
doubt about Paul's deep respect and affection for
him. Paul's characterizations of him as worker and
warrior, messenger and minister give insight into
his unselfish, considerate nature (Phil. 2:25).
This devout man who took no thought for himself
and focused only on serving others becomes our model
of quiet toil for Christ. He is worthy of admiration
and imitation.
Worker
........There are few
awards for the common laborer. Managers and foremen
get production bonuses and honors at the company dinner,
while the laborers stand day after day sweating in
assembly lines, unknown, and unsung. However, it is
the combined efforts of these persistent, loyal workers
that form the backbone of the business. In the kingdom,
the apostles' names are remembered by everyone, but
who talks about Epaphroditus, Tychicus, or Onesiphorus?
But how much more difficult would the apostle's task
of preaching thegospel to every creature without the
quiet, unselfish services of hundreds of seldom noticed
people like Epaphroditus.
Warrior
........The soldier's
life is not an easy one. He gives up a peaceful home
life in a quiet neighborhood in exchange for unpleasant
accommodations near the battle front. He trades good
food and leisure time for uncertain fare and guard
duty. He puts himself in harm's way enduring hardship,
because a soldier must fight for another. He dies
so that others might live. Epaphroditus risked his
life to wait on Paul, leaving the comfort of his home
in Philippi to hazard his life and health seeing to
Paul's needs in prison.
Messenger
........A messenger typifies
the true servant of the Savior. He is not the author
of the message. Another gets the credit for the information
it contains. He is not the recipient of the message.
Someone else benefits from the contents of the missive.
The messenger just carries it from one to the other,
braving the trials along the path, fearing the displeasure
of the sender if he fails, and risking the anger of
the receiver who may despise the message. Epaphroditus
cared so much for those who would receive the message
that it troubled him to hear they were worried for
his health. In his estimation, his own physical state
was too unimportant to concern others (Phil 2:26).
Minister
.......As Epaphroditus
ministered to Paul's needs on behalf of the Philippians,
he did so at the expense of his own health (Phil.
2:30). He understood that ministering to another required
sacrifice; it meant that the minister must place greater
value on the needs of his charge than on his own interests.
This attitude reflects the character of Jesus who
ministered to the spiritual needs of all men. Humankind's
need for salvation was more important to Him than
His own desire to remain in heaven with the Father.
Man's liberty was a greater matter to Him than His
own freedom from suffering and humiliation. To Him,
new life for the lost outweighed His own potential
loss of life. Epaphroditus walked in the steps of
the Savior. Whether one ministers by waiting at another's
bedside or exhorts from a pulpit, one can profit by
thinking less of what he is due and focusing more
on what he can do.
........Epaphroditus
took no thought for himself. In so doing, he became
a living example of the words of the Lord: "But
whosoever will be great among you, shall be your minister:
for even the Son of man came not to be ministered
unto, but to minister, and to give his life a ransom
for many" (Mark 10:43, 45). Christians have been
born anew, not to be waited on by others, but to wait
upon others, not to be honored by men, but to give
honor to God."Receive him therefore in the Lord
with all gladness; and hold such in reputation"
(Phil. 2:29).
Stolen Car
(Author: Unknown)
........The
light turns green, but the man doesn't notice. The
woman waits, but the man doesn't notice the light
change. The woman begins pounding on her steering
wheel and yelling at the man to move. The man doesn't
move. The woman is going ballistic inside her car,
ranting and raving at the man, pounding on her steering
wheel and dash. The light turns yellow. The woman
begins to blow the car horn and scream curses at the
man. The man, hearing the commotion, looks up, sees
the yellow light and accelerates through the intersection
just as the light turned red.
........The woman is
beside herself, screaming in frustration as she misses
her chance to get through the intersection. As she
is still in mid-rant she hears a tap on her window
and looks up into the barrel of a gun held by a very
serious looking policeman. The policeman tells her
to shut off her car while keeping both hands in sight.
She complies, speechless at what is happening. After
she shuts off the engine, the policeman orders her
to exit her car with her hands up. She gets out of
the car and he orders her to turn and place her hands
on her car. She turns, places her hands on the car
roof and quickly is cuffed and hustled into the patrol
car. She is too bewildered by the chain of events
to ask any questions and is driven to the police station
where she is fingerprinted, photographed, searched,
booked and placed in a cell.
........After a couple
of hours, a policeman approaches the cell and opens
the door for her. She is escorted back to the booking
desk where the original officer is waiting with her
personal effects. He hands her the bag containing
her things, and says, "I'm really sorry for this
mistake. But you see, I pulled up behind your car
while you were blowing your horn and cussing a blue
streak at the car in front of you and then I noticed
the "Choose Life" license plateholder and
the "Follow Me to Sunday School" bumper
sticker and the chrome plated Christian fish emblem
on the trunk, so naturally I assumed you had stolen
the car.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
.........The goodness
of God is declared in many scriptures (Ex. 34:6-7;
Psalm 25:8; 31:19; 33:5; 34:8; 52:1; 73:1; 86:5; 100:5;
103:8; 119:68; 145:8-9; Lam. 3:25; Acts 14:17). To
say that God is good is to make an assessment
about His perfect nature. Nothing is lacking in God.
His goodness is perfect; nothing can be added to make
His goodness better. The name God, in English, comes
from the term "good." The original Saxon
meaning of the English word God is "The Good."
The Hebrew term for "good" that is descriptive
of God's perfect character is also translated into
English by such varied terms as merciful, kindly,
loving kindness, favor.
.........Created things
and beings are declared good by God (Gen. 1:4, 10,
12, 18, 21, 25, 31). Although the goodness of creation
is derived from God, God's goodness is inherent in
the essence of His very being. Hence, Jesus could
declare that "no one is good but One, that is,
God" (Matt. 19:17; Mark 10:18). God is not defined
in terms of goodness, but rather goodness is defined
by the nature of God.
.........People observe
the goodness of God because experiences with Him demonstrate
that his activity is good. Psalm 107 provides such
an observation. The central theme of Psalm 107 is
that God is good. Because the Psalmist had experienced
the goodness of God, he could exhort, "Oh, give
thanks to the Lord, for He is good! For His mercy
endures forever" (Psalm 107:1, 106:1; 118:1;
136:1; 1Chron. 16:34). This exhortation to give thanks
was specifically addressed to the redeemed who had
been recipients of the goodness of God, i.e., thus,
"Let the redeemed of the Lord say so" (Psalm
107:2). This psalm declares that God is good because
he redeemed his people "from the hand of the
enemy" and gathered them "out of the lands,
from the east and from the west, from the north and
from the south" (vs 2-3). These specifics regarding
redemption have influenced many scholars to believe
that Psalm 107 was written when the Israelites were
in Babylonian exile. Even so, the message of this
psalm has universal application.
.........Psalm 107
is divided into seven sections. After the introductory
exhortation (vs 1-3), the next four sections portray
how God, in His goodness, redeemed His people. He
delivered them out of the wilderness (vs 4-9). He
broke the bonds of prisoners (vs 10-16). He restored
the sick (vs 17-22). And He showed his power to mariners
in the sea (vs 23-32). The sixth section declares
that God is good in his governance of nature and human
events (vs 33-42). The last section indicates that
the wise will observe and understand God's loving
kindness (v 43).
.........The Psalmist
describes God's goodness in terms of redemption and
governance. God's goodness is evident because He redeems
his people from their perils. Four times the plight
of God's people is described (vs 4-5; 10-12; 17-18;
23-27). Each time "they cried out to the Lord
in their trouble" (vs 6, 13, 19, 28). Each time
God delivered His people (vs 6-7; 13-14; 19; 28).
Each time the Psalmist expressed his desire, "Oh,
that men would give thanks to the LORD for His goodness,
And for His wonderful works to the children of men!"
(vs 8, 15, 21, 31). And each time a description is
given about God's blessings to those who had cried
out to him (vs 9, 16; 20, 29-30).
.........The Psalmists
observes that God's goodness is evident in his governance
over nature and human events. He declares that God
has power to turn "rivers into a wilderness,
and the water springs into dry ground; A fruitful
land into barrenness." This He does because of
"the wickedness of those who dwell in it"
(vs 33-34). Conversely, God can turn "a wilderness
into pools of water, and dry land into water springs."
(v 35). The implication is that in this way God rewards
the righteous who dwell there. "There He makes
the hungry dwell, that they may establish a city for
a dwelling place, and sow fields and plant vineyards,
that they may yield a fruitful harvest. He also blessesthem,
and they multiply greatly; and He does not let their
cattle decrease" (vs 36-38). The prophet Nahum
expressed a similar thought, "The LORD is good,
A stronghold in the day of trouble; And He knows those
who trust in Him" (Nahum 1:7).
.........God is just
in his governance over humanity. When the righteous
"are diminished and brought low through oppression,
affliction and sorrow, He pours contempt on princes,
And causes them to wander in the wilderness where
there is no way; yet He sets the poor on high, far
from affliction, And makes their families like a flock"
(vs 39-41).
.........All who are
righteous respond to God's goodness by recognizing
it and ceasing from iniquity (v 42). Finally, the
Psalmist declares that "whoever is wise will
observe these things, and they will understand the
loving kindness of the Lord" (v 43).
.........Many other
scriptures also declare God's goodness. A panoramic
overview of the Old and New Testaments indicates that
God's goodness is made known by His activity. God's
goodness is demonstrated in creation and in His provisions
for all living creatures (Psalms 145:8-9; Acts 14:17;
James 1:17). His goodness is observed in his providential
care (Gen. 28:8, 14; 1Kings 17:9) and guidance (Gen.
50:20) of those who love and trust Him (Psalm 34:8;
Ezra 8:22; Rom. 8:28). God's goodness is also indicated
by His statutes (Psalm 119:64, 68).
.........God's goodness
is supremely manifested in His redemption of believers
from their sins. Through the Law of
Moses and the Levitical priesthood, God provided atonement
for the sins of Israelites (Ex. 29:36; Lev. 6:7; Deut.
32:43; Prov. 16:6). "Good and upright is the
LORD; Therefoe He teaches sinners in the way"
(Psalm 25:8). "For You, Lord, are good, and ready
to forgive, And abundant in mercy to all those who
call upon You" (Psalm 86:5).
.........No where is
God's goodness more greatly demonstrated than in the
giving of his Son (Luke 2:10-11; John 3:16) to redeem
believers from their sins (Rom. 5:6-8; Titus 2:11).
Eternal redemption is through the blood of Jesus Christ
(Rom. 3:24; 1Cor. 1:30; Eph. 1:7; Col. 1:14; Heb.
9:12, 15). This salvation is made known through the
gospel (Mark 1:1, 15; Luke 4:18; Rom. 1:16; Eph. 1:13;
3:6; 1Tim. 1:11; 2Tim. 1:10).
.........If the Psalmist,
who lived before God's eternal plan of redemption
had been disclosed, had reason to thank God for his
goodness, (and he did) surely we, to whom that plan
of eternal redemption has now been made available,
should have greater reason to thank God for his goodness.
"Or do you despise the riches of His goodness,
forbearance, and longsuffering, not knowing that the
goodness of God leads you to repentance?" (Rom.
2:4; 2Peter 3:9). Recognition of God's goodness should
prompt thanksgiving, praise, love and obedience. "We
love Him because He first loved us" (1John 4:19).
Therefore, "give thanks to the LORD, for He is
good! For His mercy endures forever. Let the redeemed
of the LORD say so" (Psalm 107:1-2). We can thank
God not only for redemption from various plights in
this life, as did the Psalmist, but also, like angels
in heaven, we can thank God for his goodness in providing
eternal redemption (Rev. 7:9-12). (11/03)
Top of Page
|
|
| |
| |
"I
Can't Believe My Mother Died Lost!"
By Kevin Kay
.........I'm
trying to respond in the best way I can to the emotional
argument: "If I accept what you teach, I'll
be condemning my mother who was such a fine person
but died without being baptized."
Everyone, not just you but everyone, has to wrestle
with the consequences of Bible teaching, especially
as it impacts our family and friends that we love
so much. As we wrestle with this, there are several
facts that we dare not ignore.
.........First, if
the Bible is really God's word (2Tim. 3:16-17)and
the pattern that we are to follow and hold fast
(2Tim.1:13), then we must be a "people of the
book" (Isa. 8:20).
......... Second, if
we are to be a "people of the book," then
we must accept whatever God's word teaches (1Thes.
2:13), and we must also accept whatever the consequences
of that teaching might be.
.........Third, whatever
the NT teaches about any subject, it taught 2,000
years ago when it was first written, long before
your loved ones or my loved ones were born.
.........Fourth, whatever
the NT teaches about any subject, it teaches whether
you or I or our loved ones believe it and obey it
or not.
.........Fifth, the
NT teaches that the majority of people will be lost
(Matt. 7:13-14). That number will include many sincere,
religious people (Matt. 7:21-23; Luke 13:22-30),
and it will necessarily include the loved ones of
some Christians. I say that, because Jesus prophesied
that the gospel would make enemies of some family
members (Matt. 10:34-36). The apostle Paul mourned
the unsaved condition of his countrymen, the Jews
(Rom. 10:1-3).
.........Sixth, the
eternal destiny of the dead is sealed at death(Heb.
9:27). Paul said: "For we must all appear before
the judgment seat of Christ, that each one may receive
the things done in the body, according to what he
has done, whether good or bad" (2Cor. 5:10).
After the rich man and Lazarus died, their destinies
were sealed. Lazarus was in "Abraham's bosom"
and the rich man was in torment(Luke 16:22-23),
and there was nothing that they or anyone else could
say or do to change that (Luke 16:24-26). This means
that nothing that any of us might say, or believe,
or do will have any effect on our loved ones condition.
.........If your loved
one is saved, it will not be because you or anyone
else might say or believe that he's saved. If your
loved one is lost, it will not be because you or
anyone else might happen to say or believe that
he's lost. If your loved one is saved, he is saved
regardless of anything that you or anyone else might
believe or say or do. If your loved one is lost,
he is lost regardless of anything that you or anyone
else might believe or say or do.
.........Seventh, final
judgment is in the hands of the Lord. The NT clearly
teaches that God will judge the world, through His
Son Jesus (John 5:26-27; Matt. 25:31-33), and He
will judge the world in righteousness (Acts 17:30-31).
That means that He's not going to make any mistakes
(Gen. 18:25). That means that those who should go
to heaven will and those who shouldn't go to heaven
will not. Jesus will be a just and a merciful Judge.
I am not the judge, Jesus is. You are not the judge,
Jesus is. Since I am not the judge, I cannot give
anyone 100% assurance of their accountable loved
ones eternal state. I can't do that because it is
not my prerogative (1Cor. 4:3-5). I can't do that
because on Judgment Day the secrets of the heart
will be judged (Rom.2:16), and I don't know those
secrets you don't either.
.........Eighth, your
loved ones' condition at death doesn't change Bible
teaching. The psalmist says: "Forever, O Lord,
Your word is settled in heaven (Psa. 119:89). That
means that the plan of salvation hasn't changed
(Mark 16:15-16), what the NT says about morality
(1Cor. 6:9 10), obedience (Heb. 5:8-9; 2 Thes. 1:8-9),
worship (Matt. 15:7-9), and faithfulness (Ezek.
18:24, 26; Col. 1:23; Heb. 10:38), is still the
same. The Bible still says that we must love God
more than anyone or anything else (Luke 14:26).
The dead will be judged by Christ's words (John
12:48).
.........Ninth, I believe
that the Lawgiver has the right to make exceptions
to His law. The penalty for adultery under the old
covenant was death by stoning (John 8:3-5), but
that penalty was not exacted in David's case (2Sam.
12:13). One might argue that it was not exacted
because of technicalities -- David and Bathsheba
were not "caught in the act" (Deut. 22:22)
-- but I tend to think that it is an example of
the Lawgiver making an exception to His law. Having
said this, I must also hasten to say that I cannot
say that God definitely will make exceptions to
His law on Judgment Day and I will not say that
God certainly will not make exceptions to His law
on Judgment Day. But we must not presume upon the
mercy of God (emphasis mine - prb). If God chooses
to make exceptions to His law, that will be fine
with me, and if God chooses not to make exceptions
to His law, I must accept that. (It is important
to note that nowhere in the scriptures does God
promise to make exceptions to the law of Christ;
Acts 17:30 - prb)
.........Tenth, your
dead loved ones want you to be saved. If your loved
one is now in the "bosom of Abraham" like
Lazarus, what he wants most of all is for you to
be saved, and if your loved one is in torment, like
the rich man, what he wants most of all is for you
to be saved (Luke 16:27-28). And the only way that
you can be saved is by hearing and heeding the word
of God (Luke 16:29-31). If your loved one was honestly
mistaken and died without fully obeying the gospel,
would he want you to refuse to do better after learning
better, simply out of love and loyalty to him? Brother
Bill Hall has observed: "We are reminded of
the son who took over his father's store after the
father died. Later, when told by authorities that
he was not giving good measure for a yard of material,
he was insulted. 'My father ran this store before
me, and used this very measure,' he said; 'Are you
saying my father was dishonest?' 'No,' the other
man said; 'I'm quite sure that your father thought
this to be an accurate measure; but if you continue
to use it after being shown its inaccuracy, then
you are dishonest.' So it is in religion if we do
not change upon learning the truth." ("I
Would Be Condemning My Parents," The Westview
Weekly, March 11, 1990, 10:8:3). What if your loved
one died without obeying the gospel, but somehow
God in His mercy saves him because he didn't know
what you have learned, will that excuse you if you
fail to do what you have learned you must do?
.........Eleventh,
Christ demands that we love Him more than anyone
or anything else (Matt. 10:37; Luke 14:26).
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Withdrawing
From Non-Attenders.
Steve Wallace
........"Church
discipline" is part of God's plan to restore
erring Christians (Gal. 6:1; 1Thes. 5:14; 2Thes. 3:6).
A question frequently asked is, "What about when
a Christian stops attending services?" No one
denies that such is sin (Heb. 2:3; 10:25). Further,
so far as we know, everyone agrees that we should
try to restore one in such a state (Gal. 6:1). The
subject of this article deals with our responsibilities
in the event that the erring brother or sister fails
to respond to this effort at restoration. What does
the Bible say we should do in such cases?
.........1. Christians
have responsibilities to brethren beyond the local
church. One example of this is seen in Gal. 2:7, 9.
Paul and Barnabas were given "the right hands
of fellowship" by Peter, James and John. In other
words, they were commended by these brethren, and
this in spite of the fact that Paul and Barnabas did
not belong to the same local church as did Peter,
James and John. Commendation is one obligation we
have to faithful brethren who are not members where
we worship. What if the church at Jerusalem had decided
to support Paul and Barnabas in their missionary efforts?
Such support is an extension of fellowship beyond
the local church level (Phil 4:15, ASV). What if Paul
or Barnabas taught error and became unworthy? A local
church who knew of them and their teaching could rightly
"mark and avoid" them in spite of their
not being members of that church (Rom. 16:17-18).
There are at least three reasons for such an action:
To make sure that local church or its members did
not (1) support them (Phil. 4:15), (2) commend them
(Gal. 2:7, 9; Acts 18:27), or (3) receive them (2John
9-11). What we have said under this point is noteworthy
because it shows that members of a local church have
responsibilities toward known, unworthy non-member
Christians. We now turn to a popular argument with
regards to our subject.
......... 2. What is
the significance of "among you" in 1 Cor.
5? We ask this question for the following reason.
Brethren who deny that a church can withdraw from
Christians who quit attending argue, "In the
New Testament, every time a church withdrew from someone,
the offending party was in attendance at the local
church." This comes from the belief that the
words "among you" in 1 Cor. 5:1 mean, "In
attendance at the church there." The verse reads,
"It is actually reported that there is fornication
among you, and such fornication as is not even found
among the Gentiles, that one of you hath his father's
wife" (1 Cor. 5:1, my emphasis, sw). "Among
the Gentiles" does not mean "in the churches
of the Gentiles." Rather, it clearly means "among
their association, among those they mix with."
In light of this clear contextual meaning of "among,"
the fornicator may or may not have been in attendance
at Corinth. His not being in attendance is seen to
be at least possible when one considers the solution
to this situation which Paul commanded in vs. 9-13
(see next paragraph, below). However, this is an aside
from our main point here which simply is this: "Among
you" clearly has a broader meaning than some
brethren would have us believe. Moving along in our
text we see that v. 2 speaks of this sinner being
"taken away from among you." The word for
"among" here is the same one used in 2Thes.
3:7 where it speaks of Paul's association with the
brethren at Thessalonica, which also may include his
time in their assemblies but is clearly broader than
this. In light of these facts, the contention that
"among you" means the offending party was
attending services is not born out by the words of
the proof text. Nor is it born out by the remedy Paul
seeks when he tells them to "deliver such a one
unto Satan" (v. 5). What did he mean by this?
He went on to tell them "not to keep company"
with such a brother and to "put away that wicked
man from among yourselves" (vs. 11, 13). These
terms explain "deliver to Satan" of verse
five. However, they also tell us something more about
the words "among you." The word "company"
of verse 11 also appears in verses 9-10 where it is
used of the kind of company one keeps with those of
the world. Please notice again that, while this may
include associations in assemblies of the local church,
it is clearly broader than this. Paul says that they
are not to have this kind of company with an erring
brother, "no not to eat" (v. 11). This is
also broader than the assemblies as Paul forbids them
to eat at the place where they assembled (11:22).
Thayer defines the word rendered "company"
as, "to mix up together, to keep company with,
be intimate with" (p. 601).
This word also appears in 2Thes. 3:14 where it is
used inconjunction with "withdraw yourselves"
in 2Thes. 3:6. Putting all this together we conclude
that Paul is telling them to cut off social contact
with the person, to subject him to social exile. From
this brief study we see that the contention that withdrawal
is only to be carried out when the offender is in
attendance lacks support from a passage to which its
advocates appeal. Further, as we put words together
we see a significant similarity in the words "deliver
such a one unto Satan," "not to keep company,"
"put away the wick-ed man from among yourselves,"
"withdraw" and "mark and avoid"
(Rom. 16:17-18). They all speak of nearly identical,
if not identical, actions which, while having applications
in the assemblies of the local church, are broader
than this. With this fact in mind and the meaning
of "withdraw" fixed we are now ready to
look at a familiar argument.
......... 3. "You
can't withdraw from someone who has already withdrawn
themselves." This argument sounds logical on
the surface. However, it breaks down upon investigation.
Both times the word"withdraw" is used in
the above sentence it has a different meaning. The
following rendering demonstrates this truth: "You
can't withdraw from (socially exile) someone who has
already withdrawn (quit attending services) themselves."
If someone quit (withdrew from) my baseball team could
I refuse to have anything to do with (socially exile)
them? Of course I could! (I speak of what is possible
and not what would be proper behavior.) The above
contention (point 3.) depends on the ambiguous use
of "withdraw" and also is without foundation
in scripture. As we established above, brethren have
responsibilities to Christians beyond the local church
and a member who quits attending services is certainly
walking disorderly. Hence, such a one should be withdrawn
from if other efforts to restore him fail. But can
we learn anything from these other efforts at restoring
such a one? Please read on.
......... 4. What does
"church discipline" include? I have never
heard of anyone who says that we should not visit
and admonish a Christian who quits attending services.
Such is in harmony with 2Tim. 2: 24-26. The word "instructing"
appears in verse 25 ("correcting" ASV).
It is defined, "1.The whole training and education
of children, 2. Whatever in adults also cultivates
the soul, especially by correcting mistakes and curbing
the passions; hence a) instruction which aims at the
increase of virtue b) according to biblical usage
chastisement, chastening" (Thayer p 473). It
is rendered "discipline" in Eph. 6:4 in
the NASV. When we try to restore someone we are disciplining
them. This word (for "instructing," 2Tim.
2:25) also appears in 1Tim. 1:20 and is rendered "may
learn." We established above that "deliver
to Satan" in this verse is used of withdrawal
or social exile (1Cor. 5:5, 11, 13). Hence, we see
that whether we go and admonish a non-attender or
withdraw from him, the church is exercising discipline
in either case. It is hard for me to see how one can
defend the former practice (as most do) and then argue
against the latter.
......... The Bible says
that local churches have a responsibility to discipline
members who fall into sin. The arguments which would
make a distinction in the church's responsibility
towards those guilty of other sins and those guilty
of quitting attending are not valid. Hence, a church
has an obligation to withdraw from members who quit
attending after other efforts to restore such brethren
have failed.
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
A
Bittersweet Good-bye
By Steven Harper
........When
the apostle Paul came to the city of Ephesus,
he met some disciples who knew only of the baptism
of John. Upon asking them if they had received
the Holy Spirit when they believed, they indicated
they had never even heard of the Holy Spirit (Acts
19:2). It was then that Paul asked about their
baptism and, finding they did not know of the
need to believe in Jesus, Paul taught them and
they were then baptized in the name of the Lord
(vv. 3, 4). After teaching and baptizing these
12 men, Paul laid hands on them and they received
the Holy Spirit and then spoke in tongues [different
languages] and prophesied (vv. 5, 6). Paul remained
in Ephesus and taught in the synagogue for three
months about the kingdom of God (v. 8), and his
teaching evidently riled some who were there because
their hearts became hardened against the truth
and they began to speak evil of the way of Christ.
This conflict led Paul to depart and withdraw
the disciples from them and he then began teaching
daily in the school of Tyrannus (v. 9). Paul remained
in Ephesus for a period of about two years after
this (v. 10), and no doubt became very familiar
with, and very close to, the brethren there.
........Paul was
working some unusual miracles by God's power in
Ephesus, to the point that people would bring
handkerchiefs or aprons from his body to the sick
that they might be healed (vv. 11, 12). Paul's
influence was great in the city of Ephesus and
the surrounding region, and it was said that one
particular miracle "became known to all Jews
and Greeks dwelling in Ephesus," and "the
name of the Lord Jesus was magnified" (v.
17). Many who had formerly practiced magic [sorcery]
were converted and burned their books in the sight
of all (v. 19). We are then told "the word
of the Lord grew mightily and prevailed"
in the region (v. 20), and who could doubt it?
Paul's efforts were so successful that the silversmiths
who made a living off of the people's idolatry
began to complain, and they eventually rioted
(vv. 21-41). By their own words, Paul's teaching
and works were reaching out and affecting the
people "not only at Ephesus, but throughout
almost all Asia" (v. 26). It was only after
this riot in the theater that Paul decided to
leave the brethren there and go into Macedonia
and Greece (20:1, 2).
........And when
Paul was determined to return to Jerusalem for
Pentecost, he traveled by way of the city of Miletus
[the SW edge of Asia Minor on the Aegean Sea,
about 20 miles from Ephesus] and called for the
elders of the church in Ephesus to come to him.
After some serious talk about the coming dangers
(Acts 20:18-35), Paul gave a final admonition
to take heed to themselves, to watch the flock
among them (v. 28), and to not forget the greater
blessing of giving to others in need (v. 35).
When it was time to go, "they all wept freely,
and fell on Paul's neck and kissed him, sorrowing
most of all for the words which he spoke, that
they would see his face no more." (vv. 37,
38)
........No doubt,
this must have been a bittersweet good-bye. Paul
had done much good for them and the region, but
they knew he was going to be doing more of the
same as he would continue to preach the word of
salvation to lost souls. They could say 'good-bye'
with happiness because they knew his reason for
leaving was a good thing. But, at the same time,
to hear that they would never see him again face
to face must have been sorrowful because of their
close friendship and because of their common fellowship
in Christ. It is never easy to say the final 'good-bye'
to ones we love so dearly.
........About 13-1/2
years ago, I held a newborn girl in my arms just
hours after she was born. She wasn't mine, but
I was honored to be one of the first ones to hold
her, and I admit she held a special place in my
heart forever after that day. That was a memorable
day for me, personally, because before that day
I had never even held a newborn. I was always
afraid I would break them or squeeze them too
tightly, so I never even volunteered. That little
girl's name was Kendice Rene Mackey.
........Just about
six years ago, her mother called me to let me
and my wife know that Kendice had just been diagnosed
with a disease I could barely pronounce, and one
about which I knew nothing. I had to look it up
just to know how to spell it, and to know what
it meant. The disease was called metachromatic
leukodystrophy (MLD). That's a pretty big word
for such a small girl! It broke my heart to find
out that this was a debilitating disease that
would slowly take away her motor skills and her
ability to speak, would take away her mental capacity,
and would eventually take away her life. This
precious little girl I had held just a few short
years earlier in my arms would eventually be taken
away by some horrible disease that would force
her parents to watch her slowly slip away. I could
not imagine her parents' pain when they heard
the news, or how they would face what was coming.
........But Rob and
Linda Mackey did the right thing. Right away,
they set their minds to react as Christians should
react to such news: They did not blame God for
this terrible disease; they did not wallow in
self-pity; they did not quit serving the Lord
because they thought it was 'unfair' that faithful
Christians had been stricken with such a horrible
fate. Rob and Linda determined to pray that Kendice
would not suffer, and asked their many friends
to join with them in doing so. [She was in our
family's prayers daily.] They determined that
they would not get depressed and they would focus
on the positive aspects of her life and show the
world they truly had a hope beyond the pains and
sorrows of this world. And they did just that.
They adjusted to the life that they had been dealt
and shone as examples for us all.
........I remember
visiting the Mackeys on a couple of occasions
after Kendice was diagnosed - only after I made
sure my own attitude was right before I got there.
Every time I visited, I left feeling happier than
when I got there! I would watch Kendice's face
light up when her dad, Rob, would walk in the
door. I watched her mom, Linda, treat her with
the utmost respect and love, never complaining
about the burden she had been given to bear [though
I am sure she had plenty of opportunities], and
she was always encouraging Kendice [and - unknowingly
- us]. Her parents' positive attitude overflowed
to Kendice's younger sisters, Nikki and Erica
Beth, too. They loved their sister dearly and
would do anything for her! They did not abandon
their sister in her illness, but probably got
closer to her than ever.
........I and my
son visited the Mackeys this past April, on the
way to a gospel meeting in Stillwater, Oklahoma.
I didn't tell the Mackeys that the day I was there
was my 40th birthday because I was giving myself
a birthday present. I also wanted my son to make
them the focus. They deserved it. And it was the
best present I could have had. We saw another
truly happy family whose trust was firmly in God
and His promises. We saw parents who truly loved
their children and who were raising them in the
nurture and admonition of the Lord. We saw children
who respected their parents and who also loved
the Lord and one another. We saw a family dealing
with adversity as every Christian should: with
perseverance, trust and hope. I never thanked
them for that day.
........On November
12, I got a phone call from Linda again. This
time, she told me, "Kendice went to heaven
last night." I am not ashamed to tell you
I cried. I knew that day was coming, but I never
really wanted to hear that it had arrived. But,
I was also happy for Kendice because she would
not have to suffer from this terrible disease
any longer. It was a bittersweet good-bye, but
now she is enjoying an existence we can only now
imagine.
........Thank you,
Rob and Linda, for your indescribable example
for the rest of us. Thank you for showing us what
it means to live. Nikki and Erica Beth: she couldn't
have had better sisters. Thank you all for showing
us what it means to walk by faith and not by sight.
We will miss Kendice, but we'll see her again.
Wouldn't you like to meet her?
Top of Page
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|